Primary proposal (12/08):
Cut the pipe in half
Insert a basin of two 3-inch chlorine tablets in the middle of the pipe
The water will pass through the basin on its way out of the pipe
We ultimately refuted this proposal because it would be very strenuous in terms of both labor and money to break apart and reconstruct the pipe. In addition, residue would form at the bottom of the bucket, and over time, the water will become too concentrated with chlorine.
Cut the pipe in half
Insert a basin of two 3-inch chlorine tablets in the middle of the pipe
The water will pass through the basin on its way out of the pipe
We ultimately refuted this proposal because it would be very strenuous in terms of both labor and money to break apart and reconstruct the pipe. In addition, residue would form at the bottom of the bucket, and over time, the water will become too concentrated with chlorine.
Second proposal (12/11)
Create a filter with a diameter of 4 inches to be placed at the end of the pipe's faucet.
The filter will contain three 3-inch tablets of chlorine located at the top chamber. There will be a small hole with a diameter of 3 inches at the bottom.
The water will flow into the bottom chamber of the filter where it will be purified as the water touches the exposed chlorine tablets. Water will then flow out of the opening at the bottom of the filter and into a bucket.
We refuted this proposal because the attachment would be off-balance and the force of the water may cause it to break or fall off of the nose of the pipe. The apparatus would be very cost-intensive because it is made of a lot of extra and unnecessary plastic.
Create a filter with a diameter of 4 inches to be placed at the end of the pipe's faucet.
The filter will contain three 3-inch tablets of chlorine located at the top chamber. There will be a small hole with a diameter of 3 inches at the bottom.
The water will flow into the bottom chamber of the filter where it will be purified as the water touches the exposed chlorine tablets. Water will then flow out of the opening at the bottom of the filter and into a bucket.
We refuted this proposal because the attachment would be off-balance and the force of the water may cause it to break or fall off of the nose of the pipe. The apparatus would be very cost-intensive because it is made of a lot of extra and unnecessary plastic.